-
Archives
Abstract Comparison.
Oct 29, ’12
2:00 AM
“The girls were equally wary with one another and often spoke roughly among themselves. They frequently knew nothing about the people with whom they lived and worked [..]. Most girls seemed to have one or two true friends who lived far away, perhaps in another factory, preferring to confide in them rather than in many close by. Maybe this was their defense against living in a colony of strangers: They took it for granted that someone who slept in an adjoining bunk one night would disappear the next.
“It took willpower for any migrant worker to change her situation. But inside a factory as large as Yue Yuen, the pressure to conform felt especially intense. The girls all claimed in front of one another that they didn’t approve of finding a boyfriend in the city, although many of them already had one; they disparaged further education as useless even as some quietly took classes in an effort to improve themselves. Yue Yuen was a good place to work – everyone who worked there said that. But if you wanted something different, it took all your strength to break free.”
Factory Girls, Leslie T. Chang
SFP I: “Choices”
Oct 28, ’12
12:55 AM
About a year ago, I watched a documentary about human relationships. There was one segment that I found extremely interesting.
Approximately 20 women and men (equal distribution) were placed in a room and asked to select who they felt were most likely to choose them as a potential mate. Each individual was ultimately faced with two primary decision factors (among many):
Factor #1: Who am I attracted to?
Factor #2: What is the likelihood that this individual will feel similarly about me?
While one’s measure of attractiveness varies, particularly by individual and culture, it’s something that is inherent to one’s personality. Thus, if you aren’t given an explicit opportunity to learn about that individual for who they really are, your measure of attraction isn’t likely going to change and is based solely on one’s physical appearance. This is normal.
The second factor is a blend of risk, self-worth and ego. In this example, one may eliminate someone they’re attracted to there is a likelihood of that person not sharing similar feelings (e.g. “I won’t ask her/him because she/he will probably say no ..”) To some degree, this casts light on how one feels about her or himself, both on the outside and inside.
If you feel positively about yourself and believe that your companionship is valuable, that same attitude will reflect onto others regardless of your physical appearance. A positive external image is short-lived if one’s self-worth is lacking.
Thus, the key to attracting and selecting potential partners is to focus all attention on the first factor (“instinctual attraction”) and eliminate the second through positive and unbreakable feelings of self-worth. Employing this strategy doesn’t necessarily guarantee a successful outcome (as I’ve recently discovered), but it’s a strategy that needs to be followed nevertheless.
(SFP = Self-fulfilling prophecy)
The Basics.
Oct 28, ’12
12:13 AM
“I think the most you can hope for is that there’s someone else who even knows that you exist, who even cares about what happens to you. Many people don’t have that.”
– Ira Glass, This American Life
Narcissistic Illusion.
Sep 29, ’12
1:58 AM
After what seemed like a fairly continuous stream of “lows” spread across a period of nearly four years, in December 2011 I met a woman who I was genuinely interested in and attracted to. At initial meeting, she had everything that I was looking for and I was extremely happy.
The beginning of the relationship started as most relationships do, but there were aspects that I (internally) questioned. The first aspect was the fact that she established plans for us well into the future. Needless to say, this was extremely flattering in that it showed 1) she wanted to spend time with me, 2) she was interested in doing fun things and 3) she was optimistic about our future. As I would eventually see, the downside of this planning activity was the exclusion of things / places that *I* wanted us to experience. Those ideas were simply not on her agenda.
Another boundary she set early on was communication. While we saw each other on a fairly routine basis, our communication outside of these dates was limited primarily to texting (no phone calls). Since I had unfortunately equated “conflict” with phone communication (i.e. phone conversations that involve someone with borderline personality disorder are typically conflict-ridden), I initially did not have any issue with this lack of communication. Over time I believed she would open up and texting would be replaced by “normal” communication channels (i.e. the telephone).
Unfortunately, I was wrong. Communication hit a peak early in the relationship and then slowly tapered off until there was no communication at all. By the time I figured out what was happening, the music had stopped and I was without a place to sit.
Early in the relationship I was told by close friends that my girlfriend had a “wall” and that I needed to be patient. What was confusing was the speed by which she emotionally opened up. Within weeks she was talking about eventually moving in together and spoke often about how she liked taking care of me and how we were progressing to the “next stage of our relationship.” She even commented on how she liked “boyfriend” and “girlfriend” labels. All of this was extremely flattering and encouraging.
If there was a “wall,” I was only seeing glimpses of it. I believed that her wall was slowly (quickly?) coming down.
Unfortunately, these “glimpses” became increasingly prevalent as time went on. We would start getting close to one another, but once the weekend was over, the method of communication flipped 180 degrees from interpersonal to electronic. It was this very shift that prompted me to establish initial psychological & emotional boundaries. This “push-pull” behavior (I’m feeling comfortable with you … now I’m not …) indirectly created distrust in the relationship. What I didn’t realize was the strength of the undercurrent that had started to form; the relationship was becoming based upon activities vs. true communication and connection.
This lack of connection was also present when we spent time together. For example, when walking side by side, her arm would be next to mine but rarely around me. When we spent time with her friends, I frequently felt like a third wheel; just another “body” to be around but nothing more. On dates, we were in the same general location, but not close enough to converse about what we were experiencing. To be sure, this distance ebbed and flowed throughout the relationship, until the “tide” decided to remain far from shore.
The most puzzling aspect of her behavior was the fact that she would never “look back” when we (temporarily) departed from one another (I would always look back because I wanted to see her again before I left). Clearly something wasn’t right, but I continuously attributed this to her “wall.” If I was patient enough, the wall would eventually collapse and our relationship would begin. In this case however, the wall was only getting stronger.
Towards the end of the relationship, her behavior and general attitude towards me became increasingly ambivalent and negative. While extensive disagreement / conflict would normally be the cause of such behavior, there wasn’t anything specific to which I could trace her hostility and coldness. I was puzzled.
At this stage, my self-esteem was rapidly eroding. I felt isolated and alone, and any semblance of positive change was nowhere to be seen. I was losing my friend and she was seemingly unaware of the damage she was inflicting.
At the end of the relationship I was told that I “needed more friends and confidence,” and that perhaps I should see a “life coach” to deal with my feelings (?). While there were some truths in her comments (after all, this relationship was taking a serious toll on my self-confidence given her behavior), they were clearly projections of what she believed about herself. Unfortunately I was the closest target.
Confidence and friend issues aside, the ending of this relationship was extremely painful, not just because of the loss of a “friend” and companion, but of a relationship that “could have been” (fill in the blank: great, wonderful, fulfilling).
To have hopes that you’ve found a true partner only to have those same dreams dashed was (and is) very hard to process, particularly when you’ve fallen for the wrong person (which coincidentally resulted in extreme feelings of shame).
The kind and gentle woman who I met in December eventually turned into a complete stranger. In the end, I realized that our relationship wasn’t about us, it was about her.
Appendix: Warning Signs
- Family background
- Fast-forwarding
- Excessive boundaries
- Disrespectful behavior towards waitstaff / friends
- “Fiercely independent”
- Always need to be in control
- Push-pull behavior
Appendix: Statistics
- Relationship Duration: 4-5 months
- Grief Cycle Duration: 4 months
- Primary Feelings: Shame / Embarrassment / Isolation
- Books Read (narcissism, relationships, boundaries): 5
- No Contact Policy: Permanent
A Mind Forever Voyaging II.
Feb 11, ’12
3:57 PM
Several months after I stopped writing in August 2011, I noticed my creative and thinking abilities had lessened (I label this collective “design”). While I was still thinking of new ideas and concepts, I found they lacked the time (and “environment”) to develop.
Now that I’ve restarted this process, I am slowly regaining a sense of “flow” that I have been able to periodically achieve over the past several years. It’s this sense of flow that ultimately drives new ideas and initiatives, both of which help pave the way for new opportunities.
The basis for building a solid design foundation is to continuously create. In my opinion, writing, drawing, programming, building and reading are activities that positively contribute to this “foundation” and are a method of creation in their own right.
While creation is key, it’s important to heed frog founder Hartmut Esslingen’s warning:
The way of design is only achievable via creative model-making and prototyping by the designer. Tools, both real and virtual, connect our mind with the real world. However, tools also define how we shape things: tools’ limitations enhance our deep involvement with them and the materials, and honing our skills ultimately leads to mastership. The curse of “easy” digital tools is to become complacent after relative early “successes.” This can lead to mediocrity and a loss of creative excellence. Like the new “polystyrene slates” of many new electronic products, where excellence is defined by how well the corners are shaped (a re-run of 1950‘s boxy design), our modern-day digital design software is the cause for zillions of repetitive and bland products. Charlie Chaplin’s classic film of mechanized dehumanization, Modern Times, is a déjà vu of our current state.
While his opinion is perhaps based in the industrial design arena (frog helped develop Apple’s foundation design language), his comments clearly apply to design disciplines outside of ID.
This is one tension of many that I will need to factor into my development strategy, and will be further explored in future posts.
A Mind Forever Voyaging I.
Feb 4, ’12
8:56 PM
One of the challenges I’m facing now is assessing where to focus my creative and intellectual energy, both in the short and long-term.
While this statement makes it appear I am absent of direction, this is incorrect. My journey over the past four years, documented within Territories and Incubator, has ultimately established a new operating foundation for my personal and professional lives. On the flip side, this increased awareness has also introduced some level of uncertainty with respect to the next course of action.
Over the course of my career, I’ve tended to use the phrase “foundation” as a way for me to maintain a high sense of humility and to continuously reset a logical “starting point” so that I can advance with greater depth and efficacy.
Looking at this phrase from an alternative perspective, while a foundation is essential for continuous growth, remaining at this foundation can be potentially limiting.
I use the word “limiting” to describe several things.
The first is that one’s future is largely based upon one’s belief system. If you choose to believe that you are always operating at a “foundation” level, it’s unlikely that you’ll also see that you have moved well beyond this foundation and are capable of much more.
The second is that building a foundation that spans beyond the norm (i.e. a foundation exhibiting greater breadth vs. depth within any particular topic) allows one to operate in many areas, but can ultimately limit one’s potential along any one particular path.
I’ve reached a point in my career where I’ve labeled myself a “solutions builder” first and foremost, followed immediately by “designer” and “technologist;” the latter two ranked in no particular order. I am comfortable with this self-imposed labeling right now, but question its long-term validity.
The challenge that I am facing now is determining where I fit within a fabricated specialization/generalization spectrum, and whether that placement is the best fit for long-term success.
What do I truly wish to become and how do I get there?
The End of Incubator.
Mar 5, ’11
6:52 PM
After considerable thought I’ve decided to mark a completion to Incubator and embark on the next chapter in my journey – one that I call Territories:
It’s very clear now that what I have been going through can be best described as a “valley”, although the period (2007-2010) can be described in both the positive and negative:
The Bad relationship failure . shattered dreams . borderline personality disorder . abandonment . loss . depression . post-traumatic stress disorder . downsizing . monetary loss . depression . therapy . loneliness . isolation . breakup . negative feedback . extreme stress . panic attacks . internal conflict . analysis paralysis . miscommunication . poor decision-making skills . poor sense of self . lack of direction . life crisis . past self-realization
The Good design . values . industrial design school . sense of direction . renewed sense of self . peaks and valleys realization . education . graphic design . portfolio creation . advanced creative thinking . writing . photography . illustration . exercise . talent . strengths
As it relates to “peaks” and “valleys”, the following key points have been added to my personal “rulebook” (from the book with the same name):
- The errors you make in today’s good times create tomorrow’s bad times.
- The wise things you do in today’s bad times create tomorrow’s good times.
I may never forgive but I am ready to forget.