October 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Month October 2012

Abstract Comparison.

“The girls were equally wary with one another and often spoke roughly among themselves.  They frequently knew nothing about the people with whom they lived and worked [..].  Most girls seemed to have one or two true friends who lived far away, perhaps in another factory, preferring to confide in them rather than in many close by.  Maybe this was their defense against living in a colony of strangers: They took it for granted that someone who slept in an adjoining bunk one night would disappear the next.

“It took willpower for any migrant worker to change her situation.  But inside a factory as large as Yue Yuen, the pressure to conform felt especially intense.  The girls all claimed in front of one another that they didn’t approve of finding a boyfriend in the city, although many of them already had one; they disparaged further education as useless even as some quietly took classes in an effort to improve themselves.  Yue Yuen was a good place to work – everyone who worked there said that.  But if you wanted something different, it took all your strength to break free.”

Factory Girls, Leslie T. Chang

SFP I: “Choices”

About a year ago, I watched a documentary about human relationships.  There was one segment that I found extremely interesting.

Approximately 20 women and men (equal distribution) were placed in a room and asked to select who they felt were most likely to choose them as a potential mate.  Each individual was ultimately faced with two primary decision factors (among many):

Factor #1: Who am I attracted to?

Factor #2: What is the likelihood that this individual will feel similarly about me?

While one’s measure of attractiveness varies, particularly by individual and culture, it’s something that is inherent to one’s personality.  Thus, if you aren’t given an explicit opportunity to learn about that individual for who they really are, your measure of attraction isn’t likely going to change and is based solely on one’s physical appearance.  This is normal.

The second factor is a blend of risk, self-worth and ego.  In this example, one may eliminate someone they’re attracted to there is a likelihood of that person not sharing similar feelings (e.g. “I won’t ask her/him because she/he will probably say no ..”) To some degree, this casts light on how one feels about her or himself, both on the outside and inside.

If you feel positively about yourself and believe that your companionship is valuable, that same attitude will reflect onto others regardless of your physical appearance.  A positive external image is short-lived if one’s self-worth is lacking.

Thus, the key to attracting and selecting potential partners is to focus all attention on the first factor (“instinctual attraction”) and eliminate the second through positive and unbreakable feelings of self-worth.  Employing this strategy doesn’t necessarily guarantee a successful outcome (as I’ve recently discovered), but it’s a strategy that needs to be followed nevertheless.

(SFP = Self-fulfilling prophecy)

 

The Basics.

“I think the most you can hope for is that there’s someone else who even knows that you exist, who even cares about what happens to you.  Many people don’t have that.”

Ira Glass, This American Life

+1.